Add your content
Paste your draft, or fetch it from a page you have the right to review. Add the target keyword and audience so the analysis judges it in context. No files, no site-wide crawl — just the text you submit.
Paste or fetch a URLNogenTech reads the content you submit, scores it across seven readiness signals, and tells you exactly what to fix. A read-only assessment built for editorial QA, not another writing tool.
No card required for the 3 free analyses after verified signup.
Every analysis follows the same read-only path — you stay in control of what gets fixed and what gets published.
Paste your draft, or fetch it from a page you have the right to review. Add the target keyword and audience so the analysis judges it in context. No files, no site-wide crawl — just the text you submit.
Paste or fetch a URLA deterministic SEO rule engine runs first, then optional live search research and AI-assisted assessment add the signals that need outside context. Everything feeds one structured report.
Deterministic + provider-backedOne publishing decision, an overall readiness score with confidence, all seven NEIS dimensions, prioritised recommendations, and the evidence behind each — as an immutable, shareable snapshot.
Immutable reportEvery recommendation carries a finding, a suggested action, expected impact, and effort — so you fix the highest-leverage issues first. Mark them Complete or Dismiss as you go; your progress never rewrites the original score.
Complete · Dismiss · RestoreChanged the draft? Re-analysis produces a new immutable report so you can see exactly what improved. Prior reports stay available for comparison.
A new report each runA deterministic SEO rule engine scores what can be measured directly, while live provider research fills in the signals that need outside context. Both feed the same immutable readiness report.
Each completed analysis evaluates the same seven NEIS dimensions, so every report is comparable — draft to draft, and over time.
Does the draft match what searchers actually want for the query?
Are the people, places, and concepts the topic demands actually covered?
Does it add something new versus the pages already ranking?
Is it structured so answer engines can lift a clean, quotable answer?
Experience, expertise, authority, and trust signals in the content itself.
Are related pages connected so readers and crawlers can follow the thread?
Headings, lists, and media that make the page scannable and clear.
Credits follow a clear reserve → spend → release model. A failed run never costs you a credit.
Submitting an analysis holds one credit for that run.
The credit is spent only once a useful report is stored.
If a run fails, the hold is released — never charged for nothing.
No ambiguous dashboards — each analysis returns a single editorial decision so you know exactly where the draft stands.
The draft is ready. Minor polish is optional and nothing blocks publication.
A solid foundation with clear, prioritised opportunities to strengthen first.
Needs a closer editorial look — some signals need human judgement to resolve.
Key issues should be resolved before this is published as-is.
Create an account and run your first analysis free. Three analyses, no card required — see your readiness score and the fixes that matter.