Step 01
Editors
Pre-publication review with evidence
Review structure, FAQ and citation readiness, and evidence before approving a draft.
No card required for the 3 free analyses after verified signup.
The problem
Why editors need this
The report highlights readiness gaps, recommendation priorities, and evidence so editors can decide what must change before publish.
Editors need concrete findings — not a grammar checker and not a rewrite tool.
The workflow
How editors use it
The same read-only path every time — you stay in control of what gets fixed and what gets published.
Step 02
Review publishing decision and critical issues
Step 03
Inspect recommendations and evidence
Step 04
Request revisions outside the product
Step 05
Require re-analysis when a new score is needed
In the report
What the readiness report surfaces
The parts of the NEIS report editors rely on most.
Structure and media findings
AI citation readiness signals
Evidence panels for key recommendations
Immutable scores until re-analysis
Where it stops
What this doesn’t do — yet
A read-only assessment, stated plainly. No ranking guarantees, no scope creep.
- Not a grammar or style checker
- Does not rewrite the article
- Completing recommendations does not change the original score
Other audiences
See how other teams use it
Know what to fix before you publish.
Create an account and run your first analysis free. Three analyses, no card required — see your readiness score and the fixes that matter.
Start with 3 free analysesNo card required · Read-only assessment